For a patient presenting with acute ischemic stroke symptoms who awoke with them, what is a correct statement concerning their eligibility for fibrinolysis?

Prepare for the Board-Certified Emergency Medicine Pharmacist Exam. Review with flashcards and multiple choice questions, complete with detailed explanations. Gear up for your certification!

In patients who present with acute ischemic stroke symptoms, the timing of symptom onset is critical for determining eligibility for fibrinolysis. When a patient awakens with stroke symptoms, the "last known normal" time may be ambiguous. In such cases, it's essential to consider appropriate imaging, such as a CT or MRI of the brain, to evaluate the salvageable brain tissue and the extent of any cerebral infarction. If imaging indicates that the patient may benefit from intervention and there is no significant contraindication, fibrinolysis might indeed be considered despite the uncertainty surrounding the exact onset time. This approach helps in making an informed decision based on current evidence about how long the brain can tolerate the ischemic insult.

The other options present specific guidelines that limit the use of fibrinolysis, which do not account for nuanced clinical scenarios. Option A specifies a strict cutoff of 4.5 hours since the last known normal, while option C suggests that fibrinolysis is always applicable regardless of time, which is misleading given the critical nature of timing in stroke management. Option D implies that the resolution of symptoms before arrival guarantees fibrinolysis eligibility, but transient symptoms do not eliminate the underlying risk of residual ischemia that could impact treatment decisions. Therefore, appropriate imaging

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy